Carbon Black vs. CrowdStrike | Comparison of EDR software

Learn about the features you can expect from Carbon Black and CrowdStrike to decide which endpoint detection and response solution is right for you.

Image: syahrir/Adobe Stock

As organizations grow, they will need to acquire endpoint detection and response tools to monitor activity and secure endpoints. Carbon Black and CrowdStrike are two of the best EDR products with features that can help improve an organization’s security posture.

Jump to:

What is carbon black?

VMware Carbon Black is a security platform that uses analytics and machine learning to detect, investigate, and respond to threats. The EDR tool uses continuous analysis of endpoint data to detect, predict, respond to, and mitigate threats. Additionally, the platform provides visibility into endpoint activity and allows security teams to quickly identify suspicious behavior. Carbon Black also offers several incident response features, including rollback of changes made by malicious actors.

What is CrowdStrike?

Falcon CrowdStrike is an endpoint security platform that provides real-time protection, detection and response. The platform uses artificial intelligence (AI) and behavioral analysis to identify new and unknown threats and to stop attacks before they happen. CrowdStrike also offers a cloud-based management console that makes it easy to deploy and manage the system.

SEE: Mobile Device Security Policy (TechRepublic Premium)

Carbon Black vs. CrowdStrike: Feature Comparison

Feature Carbon black CrowdStrike
Threat hunting Yes Yes
Single agent design Nope Yes
Behavioral learning Nope Yes
Feature parity across all operating systems Nope Yes
Cloud-based Yes Yes
Firewall management Nope Yes
API integration Yes Yes

Direct comparison: Carbon Black vs. CrowdStrike.

Threat hunting and remediation

Carbon Black and CrowdStrike both offer powerful threat hunting and remediation features. However, CrowdStrike is a more robust solution based on MITER Engenuity testing. Its alignment with the MITER frame saw it named a Leader in Gartner’s 2021 Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms for the second year in a row. The product also took first place for completeness of vision.

In contrast, Carbon Black missed some threat detections when tested against the MITER framework over the past four years.

Single agent design

Using a single agent to centrally manage multiple endpoints allows teams to quickly deploy and begin managing threats.

CrowdStrike uses a single universal agent design. The Falcon platform uses a single lightweight agent deployed on endpoints that collects data and sends it to the cloud for analysis.

On the other hand, Carbon Black is a complex security tool with a steep learning curve. This requires significant tuning and configuration. Moreover, its threat detection queries are too complicated and there are several manual processes to handle alerts and remediation.

Behavioral learning

EDR software can be signature-based or signatureless. Signature-based EDR programs rely on a database of known threats, while signatureless EDR programs use machine learning and behavioral analysis to identify suspicious activity.

CrowdStrike offers advanced, signatureless protection through machine learning, behavioral analysis, and built-in threat intelligence, while Carbon Black includes a signature-based AV engine. As a result, CrowdStrike can better protect devices against new and unknown threats.


CrowdStrike is a single platform for all workloads. It offers comprehensive protection coverage that you can deploy on Windows, Linux, and macOS servers and endpoints. Plus, there’s no on-premises equipment that requires complex maintenance, management, analytics, restarts, and integrations.

In contrast, Carbon Black comes as an on-premises or cloud-based solution. It may be necessary to restart the device, including critical servers, as part of the sensor update process. Additionally, there is a feature disparity between the on-premises and cloud versions.

Device and firewall control

Carbon Black’s EDR software allows device control (no firewall management), but is limited to Windows OS and USB drives. It also allows you to create your endpoint security policies, which is beneficial for companies with specific regulatory or performance standards to meet.

By comparison, CrowdStrike’s Falcon Firewall Management enables customers to move from legacy endpoint platforms to the company’s next-generation EDR software, which includes robust protection, better performance, and efficient management and enforcement. host firewall policies. Additionally, Falcon Firewall Management offers simple, cross-platform management of host/OS firewalls from the Falcon console, allowing security teams to effectively limit any risk exposure.

Additionally, Falcon Device Control enables users to securely use USB peripherals by providing comprehensive end-to-end protection and detection and response (EDR) capabilities. Its seamless integration with the Falcon agent and platform comes with device control capabilities complemented by comprehensive endpoint security. This gives security teams and IT operations insight into how devices are being used and ways to regulate and manage that use.

API integration

API integration lets you get the most out of your EDR software.

Carbon Black’s EDR solution offers over 120 out-of-the-box integrations.

Similarly, CrowdStrike’s Falcon platform is developed as an API First platform. As new features are released, corresponding API functionality is added to help automate and control all newly added operations.

Choosing between Carbon Black and CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike is the best choice if you need comprehensive coverage and protection against new and unknown threats that you can deploy on Windows, Linux, and macOS servers and endpoints. However, if you are looking for an on-premises solution to protect against known threats, Carbon Black may be preferable.

Ultimately, the decision depends on your risk profile and your specific needs and requirements.

Comments are closed.